Trunk-Based Development
Trunk-Based Development (TBD) is a version control strategy where developers commit small, frequent changes directly to a shared main branch. Instead of long-lived feature branches, TBD emphasizes early integration, short feedback cycles, and a workflow that supports Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD). It reduces merge conflicts, shortens release timelines, and helps teams deliver production-ready software safely and continuously.
Background and History of Trunk-Based Development
TBD emerged from Agile and Extreme Programming (XP) practices in the early 2000s. It gained popularity as a scalable alternative to traditional Gitflow workflows, especially in organizations pursuing fast delivery and CI/CD pipelines. Leading tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Netflix have long used trunk-style workflows to support rapid iteration and scalable development. The technique was widely adopted following industry analysis such as Martin Fowler’s article on Trunk-Based Development and its inclusion in the DORA research linking TBD to elite delivery performance.
Goals of Trunk-Based Development
Trunk-Based Development is designed to eliminate the delivery friction caused by branching complexity and delayed integration. It helps resolve:
- Integration Hell, where long-lived branches diverge and become hard to merge.
- Delayed Feedback, by enabling fast, automated validation of small changes.
- Merge Conflicts, by reducing the time between change and integration.
- Risky Deployments, by supporting early testing and gradual exposure strategies.
- Release Bottlenecks, by keeping the main branch always deployable.
TBD supports modern DevOps goals by encouraging small batch sizes, continuous testing, and early detection of integration risks.
Scope of Trunk-Based Development
Trunk-Based Development requires teams to work on a shared integration branch, usually main or `trunk,’ with commits pushed frequently, often multiple times per day. Key traits of this approach include:
- Feature development is done in short-lived branches (or directly on trunk) and merged quickly.
- Code is validated through a fast, reliable Continuous Integration pipeline.
- Incomplete features are hidden using Feature Flagging or toggles to avoid blocking releases.
- The trunk branch is always in a releasable state, even if some features are disabled.
TBD is flexible about whether teams use pull requests or direct commits, as long as changes are integrated rapidly and validated consistently. Teams adopting TBD must align on CI standards, review expectations, and testing discipline to ensure trunk stability.
Metrics to Track Trunk-Based Development Adoption
| Metric | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Lead Time for Changes | Frequent commits to trunk typically reduce the time from code to deployment. |
| Deployment Frequency | Smaller, validated commits enable more frequent and safer releases. |
| Merge Success Rate | High rates suggest reduced integration complexity and effective CI discipline. |
| Change Failure Rate | TBD improves quality by detecting issues earlier in the development cycle. |
These indicators can also show whether teams are working in small, continuous batches or falling back to large, infrequent merges.
Trunk-Based Development Implementation Steps
Implementing TBD requires technical automation and cultural alignment. Start with a pilot team before scaling broadly.
- Define the trunk branch and commit policy. Ensure it is the single source of truth and always releasable.
- Adopt a fast CI pipeline. Validate builds, tests, and linters on every commit or pull request.
- Use Feature Flags for partial features. Avoid blocking releases while work is still in progress.
- Set expectations around PR size and merge cadence. Encourage small, frequent contributions.
- Measure CI reliability. Keep build times fast and test results trustworthy.
- Reinforce with Code Review Standards. Encourage early, frequent reviews and trunk-first thinking.
Gotchas in Trunk-Based Development
TBD is powerful but can fail when supporting systems and behaviors are misaligned. Common issues include:
- CI bottlenecks, where slow or flaky pipelines discourage frequent commits.
- Unstable trunk, caused by merging incomplete or poorly tested code.
- Poor feature flag hygiene, where toggles become permanent and clutter the codebase.
- Overly rigid enforcement, which may frustrate teams without the right tooling in place.
If teams don’t trust that trunk is stable or CI is fast, TBD can degrade into chaos instead of flow.
Limitations and Criticism of Trunk-Based Development
TBD works best in environments with high test coverage, automation, and CI maturity. It may be less effective when:
- Projects lack a reliable CI/CD pipeline or tests take too long to run.
- Teams are distributed across time zones and rely on asynchronous development workflows.
- Code review practices are inconsistent or too slow to support high commit velocity.
Critics also argue that TBD requires cultural buy-in and consistent discipline to work, without it, code quality and team alignment can suffer. For organizations transitioning from Gitflow or long-lived feature branches, the learning curve can be steep without strong coaching and tooling support.
Try minware today
